BP touts itself as green article, about the BP oil spill in 2010 Article

BP touts itself as green , about the BP oil spill in 2010 - Article Example date BP appears to be the sole responsible entity to the accident, involved negligence in activities that led to the spill identify liabilities to more parties. The contractor company that was responsible for operations at the time of the blast was for example an independent contractor. Similarly, federal supervisors who ought to have detected any form of negligence towards liability approved the operations that preceded the blast. BP however exercised fundamental control over its contractor. Four parties therefore vie a role into the blast that culminated into the oil spill. BP played a role as the owner of the site, Transocean and Halliburton who were the managers of the sight and the federal regulators who had the authority to supervise the operations at the sight (BBC, P. 1). Negligence on all the parties was therefore a major set of events towards the accident. This is because the design that was ap ply at the wells base for sealing was inappropriate for the applied type of cement. Similarly, preliminary tests were through on the structure and flaws detected, but were misjudged for success. There were also signs of explosion but the workers failed to identify the signs that could have been utilize to establish preventive measures (BBC, P. 1). The events after the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico were widely reported by the media together with investigation based documentary and reports from inquiries.