Saturday, April 27, 2019
First Amendment and the Freedom of Information Act Essay
First Amendment and the Freedom of data Act - undertake ExampleThe closing decade of the twentieth century was witness to the live broadcast of every particular proposition of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, giving millions of viewers, not just in the United States, but across the world, access to the integrality of the courtroom proceedings (Cohn and Dow, 2002). As Hernandez (1996) reports, proponents of the practice maintain that the televising of courtroom proceedings does not just take a leak the public access to the workings of their judicial system but allows them to oversee the government, as it is their right to do. Opponents, however, sort of rightly maintain that the practice, however, conflicts with both the defendants right to privacy and his/her expectations of a fair trial (Hernandez, 1996).The argument in favor of cameras in courtrooms is predicated on the Constitution, the First Amendment and theoretical function of the media as watchdog. Both the Freedom of Info rmation Act and the First Amendment clearly explicate the publics right to know, implying, as N. Hentoff (2000) argues, the constitutionality of live coverage of court trials. harmonise to this perspective, the constitutionality of cameras in the courtrooms stems from the fact that the U.S.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.